Saturday, October 28, 2017

random thoughts on a Saturday morning







  • I think the Weinstein's story's timing is suspect. Mainly because Hollywood is a brothel and has been for 100 years.  Weinstein, has been a rutting beast for decades and he's not the only one so what's the real reason  this is all coming out now?




  • I was listening to Ann Barnhardt's podcast #33 and she points out some stuff at  the 1:04:05 mark which has bothered me about Fr. Reggie Foster for years. I've seen tributes to him from several traditional Catholics and it left me quite puzzled.




  • People act like the US was the first place in the West to have legal abortion. Not so. England embraced this sin back in 1967. In fact, one of the arguments for abortion in the US was that we were behind our "sophisticated" European neighbors. England has been punished. The number one boy's name in London is Mohamed and and English person can be arrested for bothering a Muslim.  Looking at our history from WWI onward, it appears that the "The English or the Europeans do it argument...." usually brings moral and physical misery.




  • Apparently priests in Rome are just waiting for Pope Francis to die.   That's not going to fix anything. The troubles in the Church didn't die with John XXII or Paul VI. Once bad stuff starts it lives beyond the man who introduced it. 




  • I hate sissified paintings of Our Lord. This very popular one has always repulsed me. Our Lord was a man. He did not wear mascara, eyeliner or rouge. 





A far superior image









8 comments:

Mary Ann Kreitzer said...

Couldn't agree more about the sissified Jesus and I hate that one too.

Mary Ann Kreitzer said...

BTW, Dymphna, you are now being trolled by the same Irishman who has attacked me on numerous occasions. He pops up under various monikers: Lourdesman, SPbeliver, HTCatholic. I don't post him any more. Just a heads up.

CatholicASG said...

People who defend the faith of the saints are, according to the heretic Ms Kreitzer -trolls. Was it only men who were confirmed as soldiers of Christ? Were poor dears like Mary Ann instructed to shout “”ad hominem attack” like modern feminists when they were unable to defend the immutable Catholic Truth? At present, MK is a willfully ignorant heretic and a danger to souls. Tell her to publish all my terrible offences. She would not be worth bothering about were it not for “The Truth” of the Holy Ghost which she perverts. Pope Pius X fingered Americans like her 100 years ago.

SteveD said...

All great comments, Dymphna. I once pointed that out about Reggie Foster on Zuhldorfs blog and he deleted it and threw his own spickledfettednutty. He can be a pompous old goat at times. Artists should depict Christ just like he appears on the shroud of Turin.

CatholicFD said...

BTW, whatever moniker I take there is one thing that is consistent. There is no comment moderation on my blog. All the devils in hell and all their minions on earth are welcome to comment on my blog. They will all be put down by the faith of The Holy Ghost and his Immaculate Spouse, The Blessed Virgin Mary. "Lourdesman" merely indicates my belief in The Immaculate Conception and the faith of the Immaculate Conception, the infallible faith which she confirmed in 1858 at Lourdes, the most important Divine intervention since Pentecost. Without this faith it is impossible to please God because it is the only faith which can make a soul immaculate. Only immaculate souls can enter the heaven of Our Lady and The Blessed Trinity despite the efforts of mere faithless men and mere faithless women to persuade otherwise.

Dymphna said...

CatholicAG. I rarely delete comments because I believe in letting people speak but you need to retract your statement about Mary Ann. She is not a heretic.

Dymphna said...

SteveD, that's one reason why I don't read Fr.Z.on a regular basis anymore.

SPBeliever said...
This comment has been removed by the author.